|
Advocacy - International
Manila
Pages - Part 1
A.
GARCIA aka ROKAFELLA
North
Bergen, NJ
Theater
is a place where I can have a voice equal to the men... my stories can
be told without being subjected to an outside perspective.a woman can
be tough, aggressive, motivational and an example of abuse...Hip-Hop inside
a theater is a liberating place for her to recite rhymes and play records-vinyl,
spin on her head and create beats with her mouth, she can also hold a
spray can and put her writings on the wall. Hip-hop theater women
are presented with many options regarding characters.so I am not stuck
with just being an addict or a whore, but I can be an artist or a struggling
artist or an artist trying to provide for her beloved partner and /or
children... theater is there to reflect reality indoors, and I feel like
my street reality is palatable to the indoors audience because we all
hustle to some extent.we all want to fit in.hip-hop was about standing
out, not conforming and so hip-hop is both...resisting and looking for
recognition..the duality is perfect in theater.
ok
hope you like it...hit me back...I have to dye my hair red tomorrow...not
lucy ricardo red but a tint to my dark brown... who knows.it is for my
character (of the crack mother) in that indy film.
Return
to List of Playwrights
DAEL
OLANDERSMITH
New
York, NY
"I'm
a trying to write stories." I am interested in the human condition
and to be pigeonholed as a "Black female playwright" is disconcerting
to me. It is a given that I'm Black and female. No one says that
Arthur Miller or Edward Albee are white, male playwrights -- they're just
playwrights. Given that, it (in many people's minds) determines
the "kind of writing" I should be doing. The new play
is an English/Irish/Nuyorican play written by me, a Black woman, and directed
by a Czech woman. An Asian woman will be doing costumes. I
explained this to someone recently and their response was "Why? are
you trying to make a point?" My repsonse was/ is: I'm NOT making
a point. This is the way it's supposed to be and that's the point.
Albee can write about Bessie smith, Neil Jordan can do the "Crying
Game" and "Mona Lisa", Shakespeare can write the Moor.why
can't I write a play about English and Irish people? And what makes
someone think that only white males have that option? The rules
have been set by white males and it's time to break them so ALL of us
can just write...
Return
to List of Playwrights
KARIN
AGUILAR-SAN JUAN
St.
Paul, MN
I
don't have anything to say about theater except this comment about whiteness
as a spectacle: I've been living for 4 years in the Great White North
and still, it all looks like Lake Wobegon to me. Some people actually
came here to photograph the place, which is supposedly fictional:
http://www.nationalgeographic.com
/ngm/0012/feature5/
As for actual theater, I haven't paid for any. Our students staged
something they called the Family Reunion which had good acting but no
message; the point was for them to interview people all over the Twin
Cities and tell their stories. Instead, the students told about themselves.
Isn't it often true that when we ask for other people's stories, what
we hear is about ourselves?
Return
to List of Playwrights
ELLEN
McLAUGHLIN
Nyack,
NY
So
here's what I've been thinking about:
In the last year, as America's administration has steadily squandered
all the international good will directed our way in the wake of 9/11 and
piece by piece dismantled much of what is worthwhile about my country
and the principles it was founded on, I have given in at times to despair
and the helplessness of the particular kind of rage this obscenity has
induced.
The one moment of hope occurred through this medium we all share. On March
3, 2003, a global phenomenon took place which was unprecedented in human
history. On that day, people all over the world did readings and
performances of LYSISTRATA, one of the oldest plays in existence.
It was a project engendered by two out-of-work actresses in New York who
put the plea on a web site, wondering if it might catch on. It did,
beyond anyone's wildest expectations.
Every
major city in the world, along with numerous minor ones, hosted readings,
sometimes dozens of separate ones in one city, in theaters, mosques, churches,
town halls, temples and living rooms. Performances were as far
flung as Siberia, New Zealand and the press corps tent in Afghanistan.
During the course of that one day, a staggering number of people
read that ancient Greek comedy about women attempting to stop war in the
most direct way possible, by refusing sex, thereby refusing to bring more
children into the world only to give them up to the engine of war.
Yes, it's a comedy, partly because it is about sex, which is inherently
funny, but mostly because the women succeed.
Problem solved. Everyone decides that, in the end, life and all
its pleasures should be privileged over death and violence. The
joy of this stunningly simple solution seems out of reach to us, but there
is tremendous hope in even entertaining the notion of it.
In being part of this unprecedented theatrical event (I directed and wrote
the version done at Brooklyn Academy of Music--one of 56 readings in New
York alone) I felt an extraordinary, palpable connection to the rest of
the world for the first time in my experience. And it was through
this medium I have given my life to. That made sense to me. The
theater is unique as an art form, not because it can reach across boundaries
and ethnic divides--all art is capable of such power--but because of the
way in which it engages its participants in time together.
It demands that living people perform in front of living people at just
this moment, no other, speaking directly to each other, creating each
ineffable, unrepeatable event together as they go along. That such
a modest medium--it exists only in its own time and space--could have
such a worldwide effect was simply exhilarating. The event belonged to
all of us and yet to none of us, not even to old Aristophanes. No
other art form can do that. I am grateful to be a member of this
profession. I am humbled by the power it can unleash.
May we never underestimate it.
Ellen
McLaughlin
Return
to List of Playwrights
CARIDAD
SVICH
New
York, NY
We
live in uncertain times. Perhaps times have always been uncertain.
But it seems to me that now the uncertainty of the modern condition
is particularly palpable, as a strange soft porn mentality has begun to
govern our lives. There seems to be an increasing, and alarmingly
so, lack of clarity not only in local but global culture, as those in
power refuse with egregious nonchalance and arrogance to acknowledge the
fragile ecologies that need subsist in our world, and the rate of poverty
that grows exponentially whilst an infinitesimal percentage of people
control the economy.
Those
of us who practice art are faced daily with not only the blank page, stone,
or screen, but also the seeming impracticality and irrelevance of making
work for a consumer-driven culture. The worth and value of a piece
of work is measured often by how much one has sold one's work and to whom.
Intrinsic value is not a marketable commodity, but therein lies
the strength and power of what we as theatremakers and artisans do.
We are joined at the hip to the ephemeral, to the vanishing moment, or
the passing look.
We
make something for it to last not eternally but in finite time.
Art is like life: finite, and subjected to random destiny. It takes
fortitude, will, a good sense of humor and precious little nonsense to
get things done and do them with honesty and integrity. We know we are
passing through, we know art is a simple mark of our passing through this
time and space. Reveling in the temporal, we need look both inside and
outside ourselves in order to document properly what we see, hear, and
feel, what impacts us truly, regardless of fashion's impatient sensibility.
It is tempting and comfortable to submit to fashion. But what if fashion
is fascist or inhumane? Do we go along with it anyway? It is not for me
to judge or preach. But it is important to me to keep vigilant to culture,
and how it transforms and evolves over time.
Practitioners
are involved in a constant and neverending lab experiment with the art
form, the discipline, and society. Each mark, cyberscrawl, or invisible
footprint (consciously drawn or not) becomes part of the skin stretched
out over the planet, and part of the living membrane of society. It is
our job as theatremakers to not only make the mark but be alert to the
other marks that have been made before us and in our time. We cannot predict
the future, even as it is constantly within our reach as every second
goes by. But we can make a living present, a truly living present (living
for all) out of the strength of our conscience, and a willingness to refuse
intolerance in our world.
A far cry heard close:
Multiple languages are released
through the human
YES
Caridad Svich
resident playwright, New Dramatists
Return
to List of Playwrights
SARAH
SCHULMAN
New
York, NY
Thank
you so much for this invitation. The situation is so wrong that I don't
know if I really have the strength to describe it. In summary the problem
is that the white men who run the theater believe that they are objective,
neutral, and value free. They see anyone else as special interest. They
identify with plays that either reflect their own coming of age experiences,
or that re-enforce their sense of themselves as right, regular, the way
things are. When one of us tries to expand the paradigm of what is allowed
to be seen on stage, we are told that what we are doing is wrong.
Familiar is right. Like all people with power, they want to be told
what they already know-principally that their experience is superior.
My experience is that gay men with power understand that oppression
exists but are profoundly bored by women, and that straight men with power
have no comprehension of the oppression experience, and - most importantly
- the impact of exclusion and stigma on individual human beings. It's
a dismal, upsetting experience to be part of this.
Return
to List of Playwrights
SUSAN
JONAS
New
York, NY
(A
recent NYSCA report surveyed regional theaters around the U.S. and found
only 16% of the plays written by women, and 17% directed by women).
I
am so glad the report has some impact. Only honestly I don't SEE
the impact. I SEE mainstream theatres that say there are dedicated
to new American plays producing seasons with maybe one play by a woman,
maybe one by an artist of color, usually directed by a man-- in a city
like NYC, with an audience that is 62% female-- granted almost exclusively
white. I see plays that deal not at all with world politics.
I see women voting in Arnold Schwartznegger and voting against themselves,
like the Jews leading up to the Holocaust, and supporting the loss of
their own hard-won rights, I see decreasing representation in government
-- LESS advocacy for childcare -- and a world perception that women's
rights are not human rights.
So, well, the report circulates among already disgruntled women who never
seem to organize and use their leverage. And men don't read it or feel
in the least pressure to change their programming or their thinking.
I am very glad you are going to the international conference and so wish
I could go in your pocket. PLEASE bring back the news and CIRCULATE
it. We need information widely disseminated. If the journals
and AMERICAN THEATRE and the papers won't carry it in detail, then please
won't you send us emails and we'll do our damndest to get it out over
the internet.
Rant over. Best Susan.
Return
to List of Playwrights
NATSUKO
OHAMA
Los
Angeles, CA
I
do want to say something as a woman and a theatre person.
It
feels that the real work for me is in the voice work, since I haven't
done a play since the "Tempest" and perhaps I should address
that. I feel the part of my work that is the voice teacher is engaged
in the most important political action for me. The events surrounding
the war in Iraq, our civil liberties, the right to choose, the environment,
the constant amazing outrages and revelations by the government and big
business and the sense of powerlessness on many people's part, have made
it imperative to free people's voices to speak.
The
ability of the human voice in the theatre and in life, to reveal our thoughts,
desires and emotions, is one of the major components in communication.
The more connected and free it is the better the communication.
So many people are now dulled and cowed into silence and indifference.
It is essential that theatre, the most human of arts, awaken the
spirit and encourage expression not repression. I am working on
the breath, vibrations, physical bodies, minds, emotions of people, so
when they unite with text the spark of life ignites. It has become
increasingly important that people speak truly and from the heart.
When the cliff of fear rises up in front of you, throw up your life lines,
cramp irons, and pick axes and begin the climb, hand over hand, step by
step. SPEAK!!!
I hope this is okay. I do feel this Alice, that as fun as it may
be to play a pedicurist on a Bernie Mac film, or the dry-cleaner on King
of Queens, and I do my one line with commitment and energy, it is not
the most valuable of my work. I do not want to put it down, since
I have a great sense of humor and enjoy it, and there is a lot of talent
involved. Still at the end of the day, what are we here for, and
what is life about? I have this ability to teach and inspire and
it behooves me to use it...as my friend Greg Cole told me when he was
a child, he talked back to his father...."I've got a tongue in my
head
and I'll use it!!"
Love,
Natsuko
Return
to List of Playwrights
POLLY
PEN
New
York, NY
Here's
a quick thought...
I've been feeling an increasingly joyous bubble of subversion as I
scribble away in a country that seems subsumed with the words "safety"
and "security". I almost begin to bless the idiocy that
hovers about us...
hmm. Polly.
Return
to List of Playwrights
ELENA
MINOR
Los
Angeles, CA
Something
happens to women when they write for each other: they break barriers and
find familiar pathways to communication: starting here . . . going
there
It's
when they have to write to The Paradigm that they get lost. The
paradigm is still Aristotle's, who posited it most likely because he couldn't
find a pathway and decided to invent one that would be simple and easy
for others like him to understand. Communication and the artistic
expression of it are difficult and complex phenomena, like trees. He
stripped off the leaves, then cut off the smaller outlying branches upon
which they hung, and shortened the larger branches to fit them all in
his peripheral vision sightlines (so he wouldn't have to move his head
in order to see one or more entire trees). It is still a tree,
he must have insisted. I have simply pared it down to its essential
parts. He might then have chuckled to himself at his play on
words.
Difficult
to explain, or even comprehend [in one page], how across the millennia
much of the creative realm women once inhabited in theatre disappeared,
while Aristotle's stunted tree survived and was transformed into the petrified
legacy that dominates -- even rules - in the US today. Some US
women writers have accepted and adopted this predominantly "rational"
paradigm and flourish in its execution (or seem to). Others struggle
with it, knowing that what they have to say doesn't fit the box, but understanding
that if they do not or will not or cannot
communicate within its parameters, they had better choose a medium other
than theatre. Still others make the hopeful attempt but end up
walking away because it is a gut gouger. To go that deeply into
essence, then pull it out, put it on paper, entrust it to others, then
make it public and have to defend it as not to the paradigm is a fearsome
thing and often gets to be more than is bearable. Better to withdraw
and return to silence, which is what most US women of color do.
To
be a woman of color of the US writing colorfully in the US is still a
struggle to: 1) be heard at her own pitch; 2) be seen in a hue of her
own mixing; 3) be acknowledged as a rightful self; 4) be felt as a creative
force; 5) be enabled to roam free.
Notwithstanding,
once or even twice per decade a WOC of the US is accorded honor and small
tribute. Five thousand words of rave and 'nuff said print out on
the pages of magazines with a collective circulation of five hundred worldwide.
Big hoopla tolls out for a l-o-n-g, l-o-n-g ten seconds to all
the digerati via their small and smaller screens and the young are pacified
that all's well in the mediated colorblind society they insist they inhabit.
But they don't come to hear the words or see the vision. [Sidebar
question: When pain touches pain, does the one cancel the other out or
is it simply greater pain?]
[A
final note to note:] Not writing to the paradigm is
not indicative of an inability to understand, learn and master the rules
of convention; rather, it is this: Writing is what it is and that
is all it can be.
Return
to List of Playwrights
Return
to Manila Pages Overview
Go to Next Page
|